Semih Idiz | Aug 15, 2018 | 0
O Reason, Where Art Thou?
Our world right now is quite different than the World in the classical era.
Especially the advancements in technology and the subsequent scientific developments thoroughly affect the humankind. Individuals can easily access information through the World they hold in their hands and easily control the reality. At a time where any person can acquire information in any given subject and manage to engage in discussions, it upsets me that political discourse is still at the level of mythos. Basically, I ask myself this question: within the ever-developing world, to what extent political powers provide us with reality? We can also Word the question in this way: at a time when humankind needs logos rather than mythos, do political moves and rhetoric based on myths have a future?
The oriental Western look at the Eastern cultures brought in the anti-thesis of the occidental Eastern look at the Western cultures. The point I want to make here is the facts that the ‘other’ discourses developed by Eastern and Western civilizations are far from reality and include mythic elements. As we all know, Western societies are more advanced than the East in terms of science and technology. However, the political rhetoric crafted in the rational Western societies is distant from reason and close to myths. The Western societies are not the only ones with political powers that attempt to create ‘others’ and distance themselves from logos. We observe a similar mythos-based political moves and rhetoric pattern in Eastern societies.
Humankind has desired wisdom, strength, and beauty for centuries and we still seek the harmony created by the trio. Given the fact that political power holders are always in public, they are one of the most important institutions to serve the reason. Unfortunately, this statement is not reflected in reality. As I mentioned above, governing of both Eastern and Western societies are shaped by perception management.
Beauty, wisdom, and strength are seen as a difficult-to-reach utopia, and cannot find a place in our lives. As a citizen governed by political powers I can say that nobody consents to be governed by irrational techniques that are far from the reality yet everybody embraces this type of governance as they believe there is no other alternative. When we analyze the topic from the other perspective – from the point of view of political powers –, we see an attempt to legitimize mythos-based implementations. As we all know very well, mass media is one of the most important tools to gain legitimacy.
It is possible to see the fact that mythos has survived until today and is used by political powers as an indicator of the lack of humankind development since the ancient ages. From another point of view, we can also argue that rational and relevant policy options might not be crafted by political powers given the fact that they are “not easy methods”. In a similar manner, the policies created at the level of mythos are adopted more easily by the individuals and are more efficient for political powers to mobilize masses.
Even though it is virtually impossible to replace the irrational world politics with a reason-based approach in the short term, it is encouraging to see that the will of the individuals lies with the reason. It is reassuring to vision that peace will prevail, fraternal feelings will spread and most importantly empathy will develop in a political world based on the harmony of beauty, strength, and wisdom. I sincerely believe that logos will be empowered each time I ask “O Reason, where art thou?”